PDA

View Full Version : A Perspective on the (supposed) Importance of Votes


momcast
Mar 2nd, 2005, 11:35 AM
Here is a user perspective about the importance of votes:

I come to Podcast Alley because I really like the setup with the show name, descriptive blurb, links to the website and the webfeed and access to comments. Of all the other sites who are cataloguing and catagorizing podcasts, I find it to be the easiest to navigate and use.

I personally don't think the votes mean that much. Perhaps they are an indication of the size of one's audience, a that has, say, 500 votes probably have upwards up 5000 listeners. They seem to be important only in guaranteeing that a particular listing gets better or worse web real estate based on where they are ranked. So, the higher the ranking, the better the chances of visibility.

What matters far more to me than a podcast's rank, however, are the comments accompanying a listing. I will go down a list looking for shows with comments and read them and give shows a chance based on what their comments say. That and a well named cast, though that subjective.

I realise this is rambly, but I wanted to point out to those who were getting desperate about how the votes work and the fact that a couple of shows are getting all the votes/press attention... Some people bypass the votes and look elsewhere within Podcast Alley for inspiration to download.

Well, that and Amy Gahran's Women in Podcasting list.

cc_chapman
Mar 3rd, 2005, 04:31 PM
Can you please post Amy's link again? I've lost it and I really meant to bookmark it.

Thanks.

momcast
Mar 4th, 2005, 06:58 AM
Here is the link to Amy's Women in Podcasting list:

http://blog.contentious.com/archives/2004/12/22/women-in-podcasting-the-list

shadowfax
Mar 4th, 2005, 07:08 AM
I lost all my comments with the changes.

theFerf
Mar 4th, 2005, 09:38 AM
I lost all my comments with the changes.

they are actually all still there...they are just in a archive section. they will show up in the next couple of days. im still working out some of the bugs.

notyourusualbollocks
Mar 5th, 2005, 03:49 AM
I initially wasn't focused on all this voting business, particularly as I started my podcast pretty late in the game - mid january. However, after having experienced temporary glory for about 5 hours yesterday where I was in the top 20 for all podcasts and then having a look at my site logs, I've changed my mind. Within that period I had about 35 referrals from the podcastalley top 20 which is quite astounding. Imagine what traffic levels the big wigs like the D&C show are experiencing purely from being in the top 20?

I agree though, that if you have found a good niche, then they will come (a bit like that movie 'field of dreams') but hell, it seems being in the top 20 certainly does give you a leg-up!

MK

radioclash
Mar 9th, 2005, 02:42 PM
hey I've done the reverse - started in November, was in the top 50 (I think my highest position was mid 20's) and then dropped as more newer casts came in.

At first it bugged me, but as podcasts I loved like Yeast and WholeWheat were down the bottom, and some don't even chart I've now chilled out. And then I realised that this is a commodity fetishism (as my marxist partner would say) and it's like money or anything else - fun to begin with so quickly becomes a drag.

I think it's cool that I'm quite a well-known but small show; I'd not want to get large like D&D as I can't afford the b/width and hosting costs, and I think it's great that I got my listeners through it seems, mostly personal recommendations and word of mouth, rather than vote-rigging or press.

As they say, the faster you go up....(remember that FTL, boy am I never listening to your show).

So all respect to PodcastAlley - if you like Radio Clash then don't vote for me. Recommend it to a friend ;-)

camilian
Mar 9th, 2005, 07:56 PM
Well said RC. Who wants to be number one? It's too much **** work, and most of us have lives to live.

BTW- Love the show